Bertram v. Sizelove, et al

Filing 94

ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Extension of Time to File Response to Plaintiff's Motions 84 , 85 , 86 , 92 , signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/16/12. Deadline: 8/29/2012)(Gonzalez, R)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
5

TIMOTHY BERTRAM,

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00583-AWI-GBC (PC)

6

Plaintiff,

7

v.

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO
FILE RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
MOTIONS

8

C. SIZELOVE, et al.,

9

Defendants.
________________________________/

Docs. 84, 85, 86, 92
DEADLINE: AUGUST 29, 2012

10
11

On July 30, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion for the District Judge to preside over all further

12

proceedings and two motions for sanctions against Defendants for failure to comply with a court

13

order. Docs. 84, 85, 86. On August 6, 2012, Plaintiff filed an amended opposition to Defendants’

14

motion for summary judgment. Doc. 89. On August 9, 2012, Defendants filed an amended reply.

15

Doc. 90. On August 15, 2012, Defendants filed a motion for extension time to file responses to

16

Plaintiff’s three motions. Doc. 92. In Defendants’ motion, counsel states that the documents

17

Plaintiff served on Defendants differ from the documents filed with the Court. Id. Defendants

18

expended considerable time in filing a timely reply to Plaintiff’s amended opposition, which

19

prevented them from addressing Plaintiff’s three motions. Id. The Court HEREBY GRANTS

20

Defendants’ motion for extension time to file responses to Plaintiff’s three motions.
Defendants have until August 29, 2012 to file responses to Plaintiff’s three motions.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
7j8cce

August 16, 2012
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE