Samuels v. Ahlin et al

Filing 60

ORDER GRANTING IN PART Plaintiff's 59 Motion to Attach Page to Opposition signed by Magistrate Judge Erica P. Grosjean on 3/6/2017. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 1:10-cv-00585-DAD-EPG (PC) DOUGAL SAMUELS, ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO ATTACH PAGE TO OPPOSITION (ECF NO. 59) Plaintiff, v. PAM AHLIN, et al., Defendants. 17 18 Dougal Samuels (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 1, 2017, Plaintiff filed his 20 opposition to a pending motion to dismiss. (ECF No. 58). On March 3, 2017, Plaintiff filed this 21 motion to attach a page to the opposition (“the Motion”). (ECF No. 59). 22 In the Motion, Plaintiff essentially states that he filed a copy of his opposition to the 23 motion to dismiss that was not signed under penalty of perjury. Plaintiff attaches page eleven of 24 his opposition (which is signed under penalty of perjury), and asks the Court to attach this 25 signature page to the opposition. 26 The Court will not attach the updated signature page to the opposition. However, because 27 it appears that Plaintiff has signed the opposition under penalty of perjury, the Court will treat the 28 opposition as being signed under penalty of perjury. 1 1 Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the Motion is granted in part. Plaintiff’s request for 2 the Court to attach the updated signature page to the opposition is DENIED. However, the Court 3 will treat the opposition (ECF No. 58) as being signed under penalty of perjury. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: March 6, 2017 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?