Shorter v. Rosenthal et al
Filing
75
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 68 Motion for Confirmation of Court's Ruling as Moot; ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 71 Motion to Expunge the Filing Fee, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/8/13. (Gonzalez, R)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY SHORTER,
12
13
14
Plaintiff,
v.
R. ROSENTHAL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
Case No. 1:10-cv-00610-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR CONFIRMATION OF COURT’S
RULING AS MOOT
(Document 68)
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO EXPUNGE THE FILING FEE
(Document 71)
16
17
Plaintiff Anthony Shorter (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro se in this
18
civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court granted summary judgment in favor of
19
Defendants on May 31, 2013.
20
On June 12, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for confirmation of the Court’s ruling. At the time
21
of his filing, Plaintiff had not yet received the Court’s May 31, 2013, order. As it now appears that
22
Plaintiff has received the ruling, Plaintiff’s motion is DENIED AS MOOT.
23
24
25
On June 27, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion to expunge the filing fee. Plaintiff requests that the
Court waive the balance of the $350.00 filing fee in light of his financial situation.
The filing fee is collected by the Court as payment for filing the case. This action was filed
26
on April 8, 2010, and the subsequent dismissal of the action does not change the fact that the case
27
was filed. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to reimbursement of any payment of the filing fee paid
28
in this case.
1
1
Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion to expunge the filing fee is DENIED.
2
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
July 8, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
5
DEAC_Signature-END:
6
3b142a
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?