Shorter v. Rosenthal et al
Filing
81
ORDER DENYING 80 Motion to Quash the Balance of the Filing Fee, signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 8/13/14. (Martin-Gill, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ANTHONY SHORTER,
12
Plaintiff,
13
Case No. 1:10-cv-00610-LJO-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
TO QUASH FILING FEE
v.
(ECF No. 80)
14
R. ROSENTHAL, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Plaintiff Anthony Shorter (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma
17
18
pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case was dismissed on May
19
31, 2013, after the Court granted Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment.
20
On August 16, 2013, Plaintiff filed a motion for the Court to quash the balance of the
21
$350.00 filing fee. (ECF No. 76.) On August 21, 2013, the Court denied Plaintiff’s motion. (ECF
22
No. 77.) On February 12, 2014, Plaintiff filed a second motion to quash the balance of the $350.00
23
filing fee. (ECF No. 80.)
The filing fee is collected by the Court as payment for filing the case. This action was filed
24
25
on April 8, 2010, and the subsequent dismissal of the action does not change the fact that the case
26
was filed. Therefore, Plaintiff is not entitled to a waiver of the remaining fees due.
27
///
28
///
1
1
2
3
4
5
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion to quash the balance of the
filing fee is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
August 13, 2014
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?