Jerry Cobb v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers et al
Filing
41
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF to Respond to 37 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Within Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/2012. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
JERRY COBB,
10
11
12
CASE NO. 1:10-cv–00642-LJO-BAM PC
Plaintiff,
ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO
RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
DISMISS
v.
KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al.,
13
(ECF No. 37)
Defendants.
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE
/
14
15
Plaintiff Jerry Cobb is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil
16
rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended
17
Complaint, filed March 6, 2012, against Defendants Mendoza-Powers, Chastagner, and Reynolds
18
for violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment for monetary damages. On March
19
19, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 37.)
20
Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule
21
230(l). Upon review of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court shall order Plaintiff to respond
22
to the motion specifically addressing Defendants’ claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity.
23
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement
24
of non-opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days from the date of service
25
of this order.
26
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
cm411
May 16, 2012
/s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
28
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?