Jerry Cobb v. Kathy Mendoza-Powers et al

Filing 41

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF to Respond to 37 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Within Thirty (30) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 5/16/2012. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 JERRY COBB, 10 11 12 CASE NO. 1:10-cv–00642-LJO-BAM PC Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO RESPOND TO DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS v. KATHY MENDOZA-POWERS, et al., 13 (ECF No. 37) Defendants. THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE / 14 15 Plaintiff Jerry Cobb is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 16 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action is proceeding on Plaintiff’s First Amended 17 Complaint, filed March 6, 2012, against Defendants Mendoza-Powers, Chastagner, and Reynolds 18 for violation of the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment for monetary damages. On March 19 19, 2012, Defendants filed a Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 37.) 20 Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion. Local Rule 21 230(l). Upon review of Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss, the Court shall order Plaintiff to respond 22 to the motion specifically addressing Defendants’ claim that they are entitled to qualified immunity. 23 Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff shall file an opposition or a statement 24 of non-opposition to Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss within thirty (30) days from the date of service 25 of this order. 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: cm411 May 16, 2012 /s/ Barbara A. McAuliffe UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 28 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?