General Electric Company, et al. v. Wilkins

Filing 238

ORDER Re: Mid-Discovery Status signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/26/2011. (Figueroa, O)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New
York corporation, and GE WIND
ENERGY, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,

)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
THOMAS WILKINS, an individual,
)
)
Defendant.
)
________________________________ )
)
AND RELATED COUNTER-CLAIM.
)
)

1:10-cv-0674 OWW JLT
ORDER RE: MID-DISCOVERY
STATUS

17
18
19

I.

20
21
22

Date of Mid-Discovery Status Conference.
July 26, 2011.

II.

Appearances Of Counsel.
McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth by Lowell T.

23

Carruth, Esq., and Wilmer, Cutler, Pickering, Hale and Dorr by

24

Andrea Jeffries, Esq. and Elizabeth M. Reilly, Esq., appeared on

25

behalf of Plaintiffs.

26

William C. Hahesy, Esq., and Finnegan Henderson Farabow

27

Garrett & Dunner by Thomas Winland, Esq., and Tyler Akagi, Esq.,

28

appeared on behalf of Defendant Thomas Wilkins.
1

1

Steptoe & Johnson by

Barber, Esq., appeared on behalf of

2

Counter-Claimant Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd., and

3

Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc.

4

III.

5

Protective Order.
1.

The parties advise that they have agreed to a form of

6

protective order that shall apply to all documents in this case

7

and that that protective order has been signed and entered by the

8

Court.

9

IV.

10

Status of Discovery Responses.
1.

The parties have met and conferred and have reached

11

agreement that General Electric shall expand its discovery

12

responses, including answers to interrogatories and responses to

13

requests for production of documents.

14

that they shall endeavor to reach agreement on or before August

15

26, 2011.

16

reached agreement and, in the event that they do not, they shall

17

request a discovery conference with the Court and/or file

18

appropriate motions for resolution of existing discovery disputes

19

in accordance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Local

20

Rules of the Eastern District of California.

The parties have agreed

The parties shall notify the Court whether they have

21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.

23

Dated:
July 26, 2011
emm0d6

/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

24
25
26
27
28
2