General Electric Company, et al. v. Wilkins
Filing
315
ORDER Granting 311 Request to Withdraw 279 Motion to Compel signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 2/23/2012. (Leon-Guerrero, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Daniel R. Blakey (State Bar No. 143748)
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
633 West Fifth Street, Suite 700
Los Angeles, California 90071
(213) 439-9400
Filiberto Agusti (pro hac vice)
Charles G. Cole (pro hac vice)
Steven J. Barber (State Bar No. 145645)
Alice E. Loughran (pro hac vice)
Seth A. Watkins (pro hac vice)
STEPTOE & JOHNSON LLP
1330 Connecticut Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20036
(202) 429-3000
Attorneys for Defendants
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and
Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc.
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
12
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15
16
17
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a
New York corporation; and GE WIND
ENERGY, LLC, a Delaware limited
liability company,
18
Plaintiffs,
19
20
21
22
23
v.
THOMAS WILKINS, an individual,
Defendant.
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
:
Case No. 1:10-cv-00674 LJO JLT
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST
TO WITHDRAW MOTION
(Doc. 311)
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW MOTION
1
By agreement of the parties, the motion of defendants Mitsubishi Heavy
2
Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. (“Mitsubishi”) to compel
3
and for a determination of privilege claims pursuant to Rule 26(b)(5)(B) of previously
4
produced documents (Doc. 279) is withdrawn.
5
6
1.
the Court’s March 5 calendar.
7
8
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to remove Mitsubishi’s motion from
2.
The request that the Clerk be directed to destroy the documents filed under
seal by Mitsubishi and defendant Thomas Wilkins related to this motion is DENIED.
9
10
11
IT IS SO ORDERED.
12
13
14
Dated:
February 23, 2012
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEAC_Signature-END:
9j7khijed
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
1
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO WITHDRAW MOTION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?