General Electric Company, et al. v. Wilkins

Filing 602

ORDER GRANTING Defendant Thomas Wilkins' Request for leave to file a reply to GE's opposition to defendantsEx Parte Application to dissolve preliminary injunction as to 565 patent, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 9/28/2012. (Kusamura, W)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

William C. Hahesy, #105743
LAW OFFICES OF WILLIAM C. HAHESY
225 West Shaw Avenue, Suite 105, Fresno, CA 93704
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Thomas W. Winland, pro hac vice
Tyler M. Akagi, pro hac vice
Susan Y. Tull, pro hac vice
Roger D. Taylor, pro hac vice
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
901 New York Ave NW, Washington, DC 20001
Telephone: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Robert F. McCauley #162056
FINNEGAN, HENDERSON, FARABOW, GARRETT & DUNNER, LLP
3300 Hillview Avenue
Palo Alto, CA 94304
Telephone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant and Counterclaimant
THOMAS WILKINS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

17
18
19
20
21

22

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New
York Corporation; and GE WIND ENERGY,
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company,
Plaintiffs,
v.
THOMAS WILKINS, an individual,
Defendant.

Case No. 1:10-cv-00674-LJO-JLT
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
THOMAS WILKINS’ REQUEST FOR
LEAVE TO FILE A REPLY TO GE’S
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT’S EX
PARTE APPLICATION TO DISSOLVE
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION AS TO
’565 PATENT

23
24

Courtroom: 10
Hon. Lawrence J. O’Neill

25
26
27
28

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO
FILE REPLY ISO APPLICATION TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AS TO ’565 PATENT
Case No. 1:10-cv-00674-LJO-JLT

1

The Court having reviewed Defendant Thomas Wilkins’ Request For Leave To File A

2

Reply To GE’s Opposition To Defendant’s Ex Parte Application To Dissolve Preliminary

3

Injunction As To ’565 Patent, and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR,

4
5

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT DEFENDANT WILKINS’ REQUEST IS
GRANTED and his reply is deemed filed as of the date of the entry of this Order.

6
7
8
9
10

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

September 28, 2012

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12

DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S REQUEST TO
FILE REPLY ISO APPLICATION TO DISSOLVE PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION AS TO ’565 PATENT
Case No. 1:10-cv-00674-LJO-JLT