General Electric Company, et al. v. Wilkins

Filing 633

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiffs General Electric Company and GE Wind Energy, LLC's 631 Request to Seal Portions of Response to Motion For Expedited Hearing, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/15/2012. (IT IS ORDERED that GE may, pursuant to the Courts previous orders to seal, redact portions of its response to Mitsubishis and Mr. Wilkins Motion for an Expedited Hearing (Doc. No. 624) that reference privileged information. (See e.g., Doc. 372, 382, 447, 457, 586.) (Gaumnitz, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
WILLIAM F. LEE (admitted pro hac vice)
RICHARD W. O’NEILL (admitted pro hac vice)
ELIZABETH M. REILLY (admitted pro hac vice)
LOUIS W. TOMPROS (admitted pro hac vice)
CARRIE H. SEARES (admitted pro hac vice)
SYDENHAM B. ALEXANDER, III (admitted pro hac vice)
NIMIT Y. PATEL (admitted pro hac vice)
ALEX C. BOUDREAU (admitted pro hac vice)
60 State Street
Boston, MA 02109
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
WILMER CUTLER PICKERING HALE AND DORR LLP
ANDREA JEFFRIES (State Bar No. 183408)
350 South Grand Avenue, Suit 2100
Los Angeles, CA 90071
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

11
12
13
14
15
16
17

MCCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD,
WAYTE & CARRUTH, LLP
LOWELL T. CARRUTH (State Bar No. 34065)
5 River Park Place East
P.O. Box 28912
Fresno, CA 93720
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY AND
GE WIND ENERGY, LLC

18

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

19

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

20
21
22
23
24
25

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, a New )
York corporation; and GE WIND ENERGY, )
LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, )
)
Plaintiffs and Counter-Defendants, )
)
vs.
)
)
THOMAS WILKINS, an individual,
)
)
Defendant and Counter-Plaintiff.
)
)

Case No. CV 10-00674-LJO-JLT
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY
AND GE WIND ENERGY, LLC’S
REQUEST TO SEAL PORTIONS OF
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR
EXPEDITED HEARING

26
27
28

-1–
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO SEAL PORTIONS OF
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING

1

On October 14, 2012, Plaintiffs General Electric Company and GE Wind Energy, LLC

2

electronically filed their Request to Seal Portions of their response to Mitsubishi’s and Mr.

3

Wilkins’ Motion for an Expedited Hearing pursuant to Eastern District Rule 141. The Request,

4

the Notice of Plaintiffs’ Request, and this proposed Order were served on all parties. Plaintiffs

5

have shown compelling reasons to seal portions of these documents.

6

IT IS ORDERED that GE may, pursuant to the Court’s previous orders to seal, redact

7

portions of its response to Mitsubishi’s and Mr. Wilkins’ Motion for an Expedited Hearing (Doc.

8

No. 624) that reference privileged information. (See e.g., Doc. 372, 382, 447, 457, 586.)

9

These portions of GE’s Response statement shall be sealed from the public record

10

throughout and after the conclusion of this action, including without limitation any appeals

11

therefrom.

12
13
14
15

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

October 15, 2012

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

16
17

DEAC_Signature-END:

66h44d

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-2–
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ REQUEST TO SEAL PORTIONS OF
RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR EXPEDITED HEARING