General Electric Company, et al. v. Wilkins

Filing 781

ORDER DENYING 780 Request for Copy of Judgment, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 5/19/2014. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.,

9

1:10-cv-00674 LJO JLT

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
COPY OF JUDGMENT (DOC. 780)

10
11
12

v.
THOMAS WILKINS,

13
14

Defendant.
THOMAS ALEXANDER WILKINS,

15

1:13-cv-01943 LJO JLT
ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR
COPY OF JUDGMENT (DOC. 28)

Plaintiff,

16
17
18
19

v.
GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

20
21

On May 14, 2014, Thomas Wilkins filed a document directed to the “Chief Financial

22

Officer of Federal District Court -- United States District Court for the Eastern District of

23

California,” referencing the above-captioned closed cases. In this document, Plaintiff demands

24

“to be provided with a meeting in which the original ‘JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE’

25

initially offered on November 29, 2012 is to be provided” to Mr. Wilkins.

26

Presumably, Mr. Wilkins is referring to either this Court’s Findings of Fact and

27

Conclusions of Law Following Bench Trial, Doc. 744 in Case No. 1:10-cv-00674 LJO JLT,

28

and/or the associated Judgment entered in favor of General Electric and against Mr. Wilkins,
1

1

Doc. 745 in Case No. 1:10-cv-00674 LJO JLT. Plaintiff’s suggestion that this Court’s failure to

2

send him an “original signed and executed” copy of the Judgment would be a “denial of

3

substantive and procedural due process of law” is without merit. This is an electronic court. See

4

Local Rule 122(a). Both the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and the Judgment were

5

signed electronically and docketed electronically. Plaintiff’s counsel was electronically served

6

a copy of both documents at the time of docketing. Plaintiff, and any member of the public,

7

may download additional copies through this Court’s Pacer service accessible at:

8

http://www.caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff’s request is DENIED.

9
10
11

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

May 19, 2014

12

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2