Tyrone D. Newman v. Brandon et al
Filing
18
ORDER DENYING Plaintiff's 17 Motion for Injunctive Relief signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/27/2011. (Sant Agata, S)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TYRONE D. NEWMAN,
12
Case No. 1:10-cv-00687 JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
BRANDON, et al.,
(Doc. 17)
15
16
Defendants.
/
17
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action
18
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On July 18, 2011, Plaintiff filed a motion complaining that officials are
19
opening the mail sent to him from the court. (Doc. 17 at 1-2.) Plaintiff seeks “an order informing [the
20
California Department and Rehabilitation] and Avenal State Prison that this plaintiff’s mail from this
21
Court is ‘official legal mail.’” (Doc. 17 at 3.)
22
The Prison Litigation Reform Act places restrictions on injunctive relief. It states, in relevant
23
part: “Prospective relief in any civil action with respect to prison conditions shall extend no further than
24
necessary to correct the violation of the Federal right of a particular plaintiff or plaintiffs.” 18 U.S.C.
25
§ 3626(a)(1)(A). There is no violation of a federal right here. Plaintiff is advised that mail sent from
26
the court is not legal mail. See Keenan v. Hall, 83 F.3d 1083, 1094 (9th Cir. 1996) (“Mail from the
27
courts, as contrasted to mail from a prisoner’s lawyer, is not legal mail.”). And, the opening of and
28
inspection of non-legal mail by prison officials does not violate an inmate’s constitutional rights. See
1
1
2
3
Smith v. Boyd, 945 F.2d 1041, 1043 (9th Cir. 1991).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s July 18, 2011 motion for injunctive
relief (Doc. 17) is DENIED.
4
5
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
Dated: July 27, 2011
9j7khi
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?