Misko v. Sullivan et al

Filing 60

ORDER Directing Parties To File Status Report Regarding Discovery, Twenty-One Day Deadline, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/22/2014.(Status Report Deadline: 5/19/2014) (Fahrney, E)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 JOHN T. MISKO, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 vs. WILLIAM SULLIVAN, et al., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 1:10-cv-00713-LJO-BAM PC ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE STATUS REPORT REGARDING DISCOVERY TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE 17 18 Plaintiff John T. Misko (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner in the custody of the California 19 Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (“CDCR”). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this 20 civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Following summary judgment in favor of 21 Defendants Priest and Tate, this action currently proceeds against Defendants Cleinlin and 22 Williams for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 23 24 25 On April 21, 2014, Defendant Williams answered the amended complaint. Defendant Cleinlin has not been served. The Discovery and Scheduling Order in this action has expired, including the discovery 26 and dispositive motion deadlines. Although Defendant Williams has recently appeared in this 27 action, Defendant Williams is part of the same series of events previously at issue in this action. 28 Accordingly, the parties are DIRECTED to file a status report within twenty-one (21) days. The 1 1 status report shall address what, if any, additional discovery is necessary for the claim against 2 Defendant Williams. After receipt of the status reports, the Court will issue an amended 3 scheduling order. 4 5 6 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: /s/ Barbara April 22, 2014 A. McAuliffe _ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?