Misko v. Sullivan et al

Filing 72

ORDER Directing Defendants to File a Response to Plaintiff's Dispositive Motion Within Twenty-One (21) Days, signed by Magistrate Judge Barbara A. McAuliffe on 4/6/2015. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8
9

JOHN T. MISKO,

10
11
12

Plaintiff,
v.
WILLIAM SULLIVAN, et al.,

13

Defendants.

14

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

1:10-cv-00713-LJO-BAM (PC)
ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANTS TO
FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S
DISPOSITIVE MOTION
(ECF No. 71)

15
16

Plaintiff John T. Misko (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

17

pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action currently proceeds

18

against Defendant Williams for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

19

On February 20, 2015, the Court extended the dispositive motion deadline to April 24,

20
21

2015. (ECF No. 70.)
On February 23, 2015, Plaintiff filed a dispositive motion. (ECF No. 71.) Defendant

22

Williams did not file a response pursuant to Local Rule 230(l). Accordingly, Defendant

23

Williams is HEREBY ORDERED to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to

24

Plaintiff’s dispositive motion within twenty-one (21) days following service of this order.

25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

/s/ Barbara

April 6, 2015

27

A. McAuliffe

_

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

28
1