Sims v. Adams et al

Filing 8

ORDER DENYING 7 Plaintiff's Motion to Be Added to Civil Complaint signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 6/21/2010. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 STANLEY SIMS, 10 Plaintiff, 11 v. 12 D.G. ADAMS, et al., 13 Defendants. 14 / 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Stanley Sims ("Plaintiff") is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court is Plaintiff's Motion to be Added to Civil Complaint [Doc. 7] asking that the Court add the documents attached to Plaintiff's Motion to his Complaint. Plaintiff is advised that the Court cannot serve as a repository for the parties' evidence (i.e., prison or medical records, affidavits, etc.). The parties may not file evidence with the Court until the course of litigation brings the evidence into question (for example, on a motion for summary judgment, at trial, or when requested by the court). Should Plaintiff desire to amend his Complaint and include documents as an exhibit, he may do so. See Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 15(a) ("A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course before being served with a responsive pleading."). However, since the Court is required to accept the allegations in his Complaint as true for the purposes of screening, evidence in support of such allegations is unnecessary. 1 (Doc. 7) ORDER DENYING MOTION TO BE ADDED TO CIVIL COMPLAINT CASE NO. 1:10-cv-726-OW W -MJS (PC) U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For the reasons stated above, Plaintiff's Motion to be Added to Civil Complaint [Doc. 7] is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ci4d6 June 21, 2010 /s/ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Michael J. Seng 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?