Ronald Everett v. James A. Yates

Filing 33

ORDER GRANTING 31 Petitioner's Motion for an Extension of Time and Deeming 32 Petitioner's Objections to Have Been Timely Filed, signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 9/22/2011. (Jessen, A)

1
2
3
4
5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
RONALD EVERETT,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

8
Petitioner,
9
10
11

v.
JAMES A. YATES,

12

Respondent.

13

1:10-cv—00741-AWI-SMS-HC
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER’S
MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(DOC. 31)
ORDER DEEMING PETITIONER’S
OBJECTIONS TO HAVE BEEN TIMELY
FILED (DOC. 32)

14
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a
15
petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
16
Pursuant to the Court’s order of September 1, 2011,
17
Petitioner’s objections to the findings and recommendations filed
18
on June 27, 2011, were due on September 15, 2011.
19
On September 16, 2011, Petitioner filed a motion for a short
20
extension of time to file the objections, which were subsequently
21
filed on September 20, 2011.
22
23
24
25

Good cause appearing, Petitioner’s motion for an extension
of time to file objections is GRANTED, and Petitioner’s
objections filed on September 20, 2011, are DEEMED to have been
timely filed.IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
3em3ec

September 22, 2011

/s/ Sandra M. Snyder
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28
1