Atkins v. Adams, et al.
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why the Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 01/18/2012. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2012. (Flores, E)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
EDDIE JAMES OTIS ATKINS,
DERMAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00755 JLT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. On
August 3, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend.
(Doc. 24) On September 6, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a 30-day extension of time
to file his Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. 26) As a result, Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint
was due to be filed no later than October 11, 2011. However, Plaintiff has not filed the complaint.
Therefore, no later than February 3, 2012, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the matter
should not be dismissed based upon his failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff’s failure to respond
and show good cause for his failure to prosecute this action shall result in an order dismissing this
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: January 18, 2012
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?