Atkins v. Adams, et al.
Filing
27
ORDER to SHOW CAUSE why the Action Should not be Dismissed for Failure to Prosecute signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 01/18/2012. Show Cause Response due by 2/3/2012. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
12
13
14
15
EDDIE JAMES OTIS ATKINS,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
)
DERMAL G. ADAMS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
_______________________________________ )
Case No.: 1:10-cv-00755 JLT
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE ACTION
SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE
TO PROSECUTE
16
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action. On
17
18
August 3, 2011, the Court dismissed Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint with leave to amend.
19
(Doc. 24) On September 6, 2011, the Court granted Plaintiff’s request for a 30-day extension of time
20
to file his Third Amended Complaint. (Doc. 26) As a result, Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint
21
was due to be filed no later than October 11, 2011. However, Plaintiff has not filed the complaint.
22
Therefore, no later than February 3, 2012, Plaintiff is ordered to show cause why the matter
23
should not be dismissed based upon his failure to prosecute this action. Plaintiff’s failure to respond
24
and show good cause for his failure to prosecute this action shall result in an order dismissing this
25
case.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: January 18, 2012
9j7khi
28
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?