Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company et al

Filing 20

Stipulation for Dismissal and ORDER Thereon, signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/20/2010. CASE CLOSED. (Verduzco, M)

Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company et al

Doc. 20

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

L Y N N HUBBARD III, SBN 69773 S C O T T L Y N N J HUBBARD IV, SBN 212970 D IS A B L E D ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC 1 2 Williamsburg Lane C h ic o , CA 95926 T e le p h o n e : [phone] F a c s im ile : [phone] A tto rn e ys for Plaintiff G O R D O N C. YOUNG, SBN 158100 G A R R E T T R. WYNNE, SBN 220665 K E E S A L , YOUNG & LOGAN 4 5 0 Pacific Avenue S a n Francisco, CA 94133 T e le p h o n e : [phone] F a c s im ile : [phone] Attorneys for Defendant V A L E R O CALIFORNIA RETAIL COM PA N Y

U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT E A S T E R N DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

B Y R O N CHAPMAN, P la in tif f , v. V A L E R O CALIFORNIA RETAIL C O M P A N Y , et al., Defendants. /

C a s e No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA S T IP U L A T IO N FOR DISMISSAL and O R D E R THEREON

Stipulation for Dismissal and [Proposed] O r d e r Thereon

-1-

Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company, et al. Case No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

T O THE COURT AND TO ALL PARTIES: P la in tif f , BYRON CHAPMAN, and defendant, VALERO CALIFORNIA RETAIL C O M P A N Y , stipulate to and jointly request that this Court enter a dismissal with prejudice o f plaintiff's complaint in the above-entitled action in its entirety pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 1 (a )(2 ).

Dated: December 20, 2010

DISABLED ADVOCACY GROUP, APLC

/s/ Lynn Hubbard III LYNN HUBBARD III A tto rn e y for Plaintiff BYRON CHAPMAN

D a te d : December 20, 2010

K E E S A L , YOUNG & LOGAN

/s/ Garrett R. Wynne GARRETT R. WYNNE A ttorn ey for Defendant VALERO CALIFORNIA R E T A IL COMPANY

ORDER IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint of plaintiff, USDC Case No. 1:10-cv0 0 7 5 8 -L J O -G S A , is hereby dismissed with prejudice. The clerk is directed to close this a c tio n . IT IS SO ORDERED. D a te d : 66h44d December 20, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

S tip u la tio n for Dismissal and [Proposed] O r d e r Thereon

-2-

Chapman v. Valero California Retail Company, et al. Case No. 1:10-cv-00758-LJO-GSA