Carlson v. Hansen, et al.

Filing 90

ORDER DISMISSING Claims Against Defendants McCave, O'Brien and Garza, With Prejudice, Pursuant to Parties' Stipulation 87 - 89 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 12/6/14. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 THOMAS JOHN CARLSON, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS AGAINST DEFENDANTS MCCAVE, O’BRIEN, AND GARZA, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO PARTIES’ STIPULATION R. HANSEN, et al., 14 Case No. 1:10-cv-00759-LJO-SKO (PC) Defendants. _____________________________________/ (Docs. 87-89) 15 16 Plaintiff Thomas John Carlson, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 17 filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on April 30, 2010. This action is 18 proceeding on Plaintiff’s third amended complaint, filed on November 6, 2013, against fifteen 19 defendants, all of whom have appeared. On December 4, 2014, the parties filed a stipulation to 20 dismiss the claims against Defendants McCave, O’Brien, and Garza, with prejudice. Fed. R. Civ. 21 P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Accordingly, pursuant to the parties’ stipulation, the claims against Defendants 22 McCave, O’Brien, and Garza are DISMISSED with prejudice, and each party shall bear his or her 23 own litigation costs and attorney’s fees. Id. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: December 6, 2014 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?