Electronic Recyclers International Inc. v. Electronic Recyclers of America LLC. et al

Filing 27

STIPULATION and ORDER GRANTING the parties' request for a continuance of the hearing on the Motion to Compel, document 19 , currently set for hearing on 3/18/2011 and CONTINUING it to 4/1/2011 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 10 (GSA) before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin; order signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 3/11/2011. (Rooney, M)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Timothy J. Buchanan, # 100409 Mandy L. Jeffcoach, # 232313 McCormick, Barstow, Sheppard, Wayte & Carruth LLP P.O. Box 28912 5 River Park Place East Fresno, CA 93720-1501 Telephone: (559) 433-1300 Facsimile: (559) 433-2300 Attorneys for Defendants DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC. and DAVID A. DLUBAK and Counterclaimant DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC. (SPACE BELOW FOR FILING STAMP ONLY) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation, and ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS OF AMERICA LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, Plaintiffs, v. DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC., a Pennsylvania Corporation, DAVID A. DLUBAK, an individual, and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive,, Defendants. Case No. 1:10-CV-00760-LJO-GSA ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION IN PART AND CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO COMPEL Date: March 18, 2011 Time: 9:30 a.m. Courtroom: 10 Magistrate Judge: Honorable Gary S. Austin 19 Trial Date: October 31, 2011 20 21 Counterclaimant 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC. a Pennsylvania Corporation, ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Delaware Corporation Counterdefendant STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO COMPEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 The parties to this action, through their attorneys of record, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. The hearing date on the Motion to Compel filed by Dlubak Glass Company, presently set for March 18, 2011, shall be, with the Court's approval, extended and continued. 2. The hearing date on the motion, with the Court's approval, will now be March 25, 2011, at 10:00 a.m., in Courtroom 10 of this Court, before the Honorable Gary S. Austin, United State Magistrate Judge. This stipulation will enable the parties to continue discussions to eliminate or narrow the areas of the dispute in discovery. It is presented in good faith and for no purpose of delay. Dated: March 11, 2011 McCORMICK, BARSTOW, SHEPPARD, WAYTE & CARRUTH LLP By:___ ___/s/ Timothy J. Buchanan____ ___ Timothy J. Buchanan Mandy L. Jeffcoach Attorneys for Defendants DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC. and DAVID A. DLUBAK and Counter Claimant DLUBAK GLASS COMPANY, INC. Dated: March 11, 2011 DOWLING, AARON & KEELER, INC. By:_________/s/ Donald R. Fischbach ______ Donald R. Fischbach G. Andrew Slater Attorneys for Plaintiffs ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS INTERNATIONAL INC., and ELECTRONIC RECYCLERS OF AMERICA, LLC 1 STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO COMPEL 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DEAC_Signature-END: ORDER Based on the above stipulation, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Motion to Compel currently on calendar for March 18, 2011, shall be, and hereby is, continued to April 1, 2011, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10. Counsel shall personally appear; no telephonic appearances will be permitted. Further, counsel shall be prepared to participate in extensive meet and confer proceedings on this date as directed by this Court. Dated: March 11, 2011 /s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MCCORMICK, BARSTOW , SHEPPARD, W AYTE & CARRUTH LLP 5 R IVER PARK PLACE EAST FRESNO, CA 93720-1501 i70h38d6 2 STIPULATION CONTINUING HEARING DATE ON MOTION TO COMPEL S

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?