Garrett v. Myers et al

Filing 27

ORDER Finding That Plaintiff is Entitled to Proceed In Forma Pauperis on 23 Appeal Filed August 3, 2011, re: 26 USCA Order; ORDER Directing Clerk's Office to Serve Copy of Order on Ninth Circuit, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 8/11/11. (Gonzalez, R)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9

JAMES JAMIL GARRETT,
Plaintiff,

10
11

v.

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00779-GBC (PC)
ORDER FINDING THAT PLAINTIFF IS
ENTITLED TO PROCEED IN FORMA
PAUPERIS ON APPEAL FILED AUGUST 3,
2011

12
MYERS, et al.,

(ECF No. 26)

13
Defendants.
14

ORDER DIRECTING CLERK’S OFFICE TO
SERVE COPY OF ORDER ON NINTH
/ CIRCUIT

15
ORDER

16
17

James Jamil Garrett (“Plaintiff”) proceeded pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil

18

rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 15, 2011, the Court dismissed

19

Plaintiff’s action, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (ECF

20

No. 19.) On August 3, 2011, Plaintiff filed a notice of appeal and on August 9, 2011, the

21

Ninth Circuit remanded for the limited purpose of determining whether in forma pauperis

22

status should continue for this appeal or whether the appeal is frivolous or taken in bad

23

faith. (ECF Nos. 23 & 26.)

24

Pursuant to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure,

25

A party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the district-court
action . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further
authorization, unless:

26
27
28

(A) the district court - before or after the notice of appeal is filed - certifies
that the appeal is not taken in good faith or finds that the party is not
otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and states in writing its
1

1

reasons for the certification or finding;
or

2
(B) a statute provides otherwise.
3
Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3).
4
5
6

The district clerk must immediately notify the parties and the court of appeals
when the district court does any of the following:
(A) denies a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis;
(B) certifies that the appeal is not taken in good faith; or
(C) finds that the party is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis.

7
8

Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).

9

Because Plaintiff proceeded in forma pauperis in this action, Plaintiff is entitled to

10

proceed in forma pauperis on appeal unless the Court finds his appeal is not taken in good

11

faith or finds that he is not otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis. As set forth

12

below by this Order, the Court finds that Plaintiff is entitled to proceed in forma pauperis

13

on appeal.

14

“An appeal may not be taken in forma pauperis if the trial court certifies in writing

15

that it is not taken in good faith.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). “In the absence of some evident

16

improper motive, the applicant’s good faith is established by the presentation of any issue

17

that is not plainly frivolous.” Ellis v. United States, 356 U.S. 674 (1958). An action is

18

frivolous “where it lacks an arguable basis either in law or in fact.” Neitzke v. Williams, 490

19

U.S. 319, 325 (1989). In other words, the term “frivolous”, as used in § 1915 and when

20

applied to a complaint, “embraces not only the inarguable legal conclusion, but also the

21

fanciful factual allegation.” Id.

22

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, Plaintiff can appeal the Court’s June 15, 2011 Order

23

dismissing the action as a final and appealable order. Here, the Court an Order dismissing

24

the action because Plaintiff had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies before filing

25

his Complaint. (ECF No. 19.)

26

Given that Plaintiff’s action was dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative

27

remedies and the absence of improper motive, Plaintiff’s appeal is not plainly frivolous. It

28

does not appear to lack an arguable basis either in law or in fact.
2

1

Based on the foregoing, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

Plaintiff’s appeal is taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The Clerk’s Office

3

shall serve a copy of this order on the Ninth Circuit.

4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6
7

Dated:
1j0bbc

August 11, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3