Vance v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 23

STIPULATION and ORDER awarding attorney fees signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 3/31/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
(SS) Vance v. Commissioner of Social Security Doc. 23 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8975 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail: Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION LEO WAYNE VANCE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of ) Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 1:10-CV-0782-OWW-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER AWARDING ATTORNEY FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT (28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)) IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), in the amount of ONE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED FIFTY DOLLARS AND 00/CENTS ($1,750.00). This amount represents compensation for all legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff, the government will consider the matter of Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and expenses to Plaintiff's attorney. Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2010 WL 2346547 (U.S. June 14, 2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees and expenses are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the Treasury's Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees and expenses is entered, the government will determine whether they are subject to any offset. Fees and expenses shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the government shall cause the payment of fees and expenses to be made directly to the Law Offices of Jeffrey Milam, pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff. Any payments made shall be delivered to Plaintiff's counsel. This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff's request for EAJA attorney fees and expenses, and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA. Payment of the agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or Plaintiff's counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees and expenses in connection with this action. This award is without prejudice to the rights of Plaintiff's counsel to seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406, subject to the provisions of the EAJA. Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 7, 2011 /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh (As authorized via e-mail) SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH Attorney for Plaintiff BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Brenda M. Pullin BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant Dated: March 7, 2011 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj March 31, 2011 ORDER Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff be awarded $1,750.00 in attorney fees under 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 - Stip & Order for EAJA Fees

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?