Cato v. Avila et al

Filing 92

ORDER ADOPTING 88 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 58 , 59 , 60 , 62 , 72 , 75 Plaintiff's Motions for Injunctive Relief, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 11/21/2012. (Jessen, A)

1
2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

3

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

4
JAMES CATO,

1:10-cv-793-AWI-MJS (PC)

5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR INJUNCTIVE
RELIEF

T. AVILA, et al.,
8

(ECF No. 58, 59, 60, 62, 72, 75, & 88)
Defendants.

9
10
_______________________________/
11
12
Plaintiff James Cato (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a civil rights action
13
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge
14
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
15
On October 24, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and Recommendations
16
recommending that Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief be denied. (ECF No. 88.) Plaintiff has
17
failed to file objections to the Findings and Recommendations.
18
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(c) and Local Rule 305, this
19
Court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the
20
Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper
21
analysis.
22
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
23
1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed October 24, 2012, are adopted in full; and

2.

Plaintiff’s motions for injunctive relief (ECF Nos. 58, 59, 60, 62, 72 & 75) are DENIED.

24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
0m8i78

November 21, 2012
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
-1-