Ramirez v. USA, et al.
Filing
9
ORDER after Settlement signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 07/07/2010. Response due by 8/24/2010. (Flores, E)
Ramirez v. USA, et al.
Doc. 9
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: 66h44d Defendants. ____________________________/ Plaintiff's counsel filed a notice of settlement. Pursuant to this Court's Local Rule 160, this Court ORDERS the parties, no later than August 24, 2010, to file papers to dismiss this action in its entirety, or to show cause why settlement has not been completed to permit dismissal of this action. This Court VACATES all court dates and pending matters, including the August 25, 2010 scheduling conference. Failure to comply with this order may be grounds for the imposition of sanctions on any and all counsel or parties who contributed to the violation of this order. See Local Rule 160 and 272. IT IS SO ORDERED. July 7, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE vs. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., JULISSA RAMIREZ, Plaintiff, CASE NO. CV F 10-0799 LJO JLT ORDER AFTER SETTLEMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Dockets.Justia.com
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?