Ricchio v. Hornbeak et al

Filing 16

ORDER disregarding 13 Objection to order and Motion for Reconsideration signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/19/2010. (Lundstrom, T)

(HC) Ricchio v. Hornbeak et al

Doc. 16

1 2 3 4 5 6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter has been referred to the Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) and Local Rules 302 and 303. Petitioner is an inmate of Valley State Prison for Women (VSPW) in Chowchilla, California, which is within the Eastern District of California. Petitioner is serving a sentence LINDA ELIZABETH RICCHIO, ) ) Petitioner, ) ) ) v. ) ) WARDEN TINA HORNBEAK, et al., ) ) Respondents. ) ) ) 1:10-cv--0824-SKO-HC ORDER DISREGARDING PETITIONER'S OBJECTION TO ORDER TRANSFERRING ACTION AND MOTIONS TO RECONSIDER AND FOR RELIEF FROM TRANSFER PURSUANT TO Fed. R. Civ. P. 5960(b) (DOC. 13)

pursuant to a conviction in the San Diego Superior Court (pet. 3) and challenges a decision to deny her parole, which was rendered at VSPW. On May 10, 2010, Petitioner's action was transferred to

this Court from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. 1
Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

On May 27, 2010, Petitioner filed objections to the transfer, a motion for reconsideration of the transfer, and a motion for relief from the transfer. Her objections and motions

were captioned for the United States District Court for the Southern District of California. (Doc. 13, 1.) Further,

Petitioner stated in her papers that she was filing the motion in the Southern District, and she was serving a copy on this Court. (Id.) The Clerk of this Court, however, docketed the papers as

an objection and motion to reconsider pending in this Court. Accordingly, to maintain the integrity of the docket, Petitioner's objections and motions for reconsideration of, and relief from, the order of transfer are DISREGARDED.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj July 19, 2010 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2