Humple v. Rooda et al

Filing 13

ORDER DISMISSING Plaintiff's Case Without Prejudice For Failure to Obey a Court Order, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 9/19/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Marrujo, C)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
10

JEFFREY A. HUMPLE,

11
12

CASE NO.

Plaintiff,

1:10-cv-00843-GBC (PC)

ORDER DISMISSING PLAINTIFF’S CASE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO
OBEY A COURT ORDER

v.

13
K. ROODA, et al.,

CLERK TO CLOSE CASE

14
Defendants.

15

/

16
ORDER

17
18
19

Plaintiff Jeffrey A. Humple (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner is proceeding pro se and
in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this

20
action on May 13, 2010 and consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on July 14, 2010.
21
22

(ECF Nos. 1 & 7.)

23

In its June 10, 2011 Screening Order, the Court found that Plaintiff failed to state

24

any cognizable claims and granted him leave to amend. (ECF No. 9.) He was also warned

25

that failure to comply with that Order could result in dismissal of his action for failure to

26

obey a Court Order. Plaintiff then filed a motion to dismiss that requested injunctive relief.

27
1

1

(ECF No. 10.) The Court denied the request and ordered that Plaintiff clarify if he wanted

2

the action to be dismissed. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff did not respond. The Court then issued

3

an order to show cause why the case should not be dismissed. (ECF No. 12.) To date,

4
5
6

the Court has not received a response to the Show Cause Order and Plaintiff has not filed
an amended complaint or a clarification of his dismissal request.
Accordingly, this action is HEREBY DISMISSED, without prejudice, based on

7
8

Plaintiff's failure to obey several Court Orders. The Clerk shall close the case.

9

IT IS SO ORDERED.

10
11

Dated:
1j0bbc

September 19, 2011
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
2