Rodriguez v. Hubbard et al

Filing 104

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION and DENYING Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction 78 , 99 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 10/31/14. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11

LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

Case No. 1:10-cv-00858 LJO DLB PC
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION AND DENYING
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR TEMPORARY
RESTRAINING ORDER AND
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

v.
HUBBARD, et al.,

15

Defendants.

[ECF Nos. 78, 99]

16
17

Plaintiff Luis Valenzuela Rodriguez, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma

18 pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 5, 2010. The matter
19 was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
20 Rule 302.
21

On September 25, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and Recommendations that

22 recommended Plaintiff’s motion for temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction be
23 DENIED. The Findings and Recommendation was served on all parties and contained notice
24 that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days. Over thirty days have passed and no
25 party has filed objections.
26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted

27 a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds that the
28 Findings and Recommendations are supported by the record and by proper analysis.

1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for temporary

2 restraining order and preliminary injunction is DENIED.
3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

October 31, 2014

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2