Rodriguez v. Hubbard et al
Filing
46
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 45 Motion Requesting In Forma Pauperis Status and Service by United States Marshal; ORDER Granting in Part Plaintiff's Second Motion for Extension of Time to Effect Service signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 02/11/2013. Service of Process due by by 5/17/2013. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7
LUIS VALENZUELA RODRIGUEZ,
8
Plaintiff,
9
v.
10
Case No. 1:10-cv-00858-DLB PC
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION REQUESTING IN FORMA
PAUPERIS STATUS AND SERVICE BY
UNITED STATES MARSHAL
SUSAN HUBBARD, et al.,
11
Defendants.
12
ORDER GRANTING IN PART
PLAINTIFF’S SECOND MOTION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME TO EFFECT
SERVICE
13
ECF No. 45
14
SERVICE DEADLINE: MAY 17, 2013
15
16
Plaintiff Luis Valenzuela Rodriguez (“Plaintiff”) is a California state prisoner proceeding pro
17
se in a civil action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed his third amended complaint on
18
February 29, 2012. By separate order, the Court has screened Plaintiff’s third amended complaint
19
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and finds that it states cognizable claims for relief against
20
Defendants Hubbard, Cate, Harrington, Biter, Soto, Phillips, Da Veiga, Ozaeta, Betzinger, Gregory,
21
Garza, Wegman, Alic, Grissom, Speidell, Davis, Foster, Freir, and Rankin. On November 16, 2012,
22
the Court granted Plaintiff 120 days by which to effect service of process. Pending before the Court
23
is Plaintiff’s motion, filed February 6, 2013, requesting 1) to proceed in forma pauperis in all further
24
proceedings and to have the United States Marshal effect service of process and 2) in the alternative,
25
be granted an additional 120 days to complete service. ECF No. 45.
26
As to Plaintiff’s first request, the Court will again explain that Plaintiff is not proceeding in
27
forma pauperis because the filing fee was paid in full. Plaintiff was presented the option of either
28
filing the correct in forma pauperis application or paying the full filing fee, and Plaintiff opted for
1
1
the latter. Plaintiff is not proceeding in forma pauperis in this action. Plaintiff is not entitled to have
2
the United States Marshal effect service of process. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(3) (service by the
3
United States Marshal required only when party is proceeding in forma pauperis). Plaintiff cites to
4
the Court’s May 14, 2010 Order, which suggested that the United States Marshal would serve
5
process after the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. To the extent that the order suggested that
6
Plaintiff would always have the benefit of the United States Marshal effecting service of process, the
7
order is incorrect.
As to Plaintiff’s second request, the Court will grant Plaintiff a limited extension of time to
8
9
complete service of process. No further extensions of time will be granted. If Plaintiff does not
10
effect service of process in a timely manner, the Court will dismiss the action without prejudice as to
11
each Defendant.
12
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that:
13
1. Plaintiff’s motion, filed February 6, 2013, requesting to proceed in forma pauperis in all
14
further proceedings and to have the United States Marshal effect service of process, is
15
denied;
2. Plaintiff’s motion, filed February 6, 2013, requesting an extension of time to complete
16
17
service of process is granted in part;
18
3. Plaintiff is granted up to May 17, 2013 by which to complete service of process on
19
Defendants;
20
4. Failure to effect service of process by the deadline will result in dismissal of the action
21
without prejudice as to each Defendant on whom Plaintiff fails to serve process.
22
23
24
IT IS SO ORDERED.
25
Dated:
/s/ Dennis
February 11, 2013
L. Beck
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
DEAC_Signature-END:
27
3b142a
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?