Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Alvarado et al

Filing 47

ORDER GRANTING 46 Joint Motion to Dismiss (1) Crossclaim of Adolfo Ordaz, Jr., Susana Garcia, and Andres Garcia Against David Alvarado and Linda Alvarado and (2) Counterclaim of David Alvarado and Linda Alvarado Against Adolfo Ordaz, Jr., Susana Garcia and Andres Garcia signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/21/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) DAVID ALVARADO, LINDA ) ALVARADO, ADOLFO ORDAZ, JR., ) SUSANA GARCIA AND ANDRES ) GARCIA, individually and d/b/a FANKIE’S ) BAR a/k/a PATRON’S SPORTS BAR, ) ) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ____________________________________ ) Case No.: 1:10-CV-00907-LJO-JLT ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION TO DISMISS: (1) CROSSCLAIM OF ADOLFO ORDAZ, JR. SUSANA GARCIA, AND ANDRES GARCIA AGAINST DAVID ALVARADO AND LINDA ALVARADO; AND (2) COUNTERCLAIM OF DAVID ALVARADO AND LINDA ALVARADO AGAINST ADOLFO ORDAZ, JR., SUSANA GARCIA, AND ANDRES GARCIA [Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1)(ii)] 13 14 Good cause appearing, the joint motion to dismiss (1) the crossclaim of Adolfo Ordaz, Jr., 15 Susana Garcia, and Andres Garcia against David Alvarado and Linda Alvarado, and (2) the 16 counterclaim of David Alvarado and Linda Alvarado against Adolfo Ordaz, Jr., Susana Garcia, 17 and Andres Garcia is granted. The subject claims are hereby dismissed with prejudice. This 18 dismissal is made pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 41(a)(1). Each party 19 referenced above shall bear their own attorney’s fees and costs. DEAC_Signature-END: 20 b9ed48bb 21 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 23 24 25 June 21, 2011 /s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DEAC_Signature-END: Order 26 27 28 1 1 b9ed48bb 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Order 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?