Chavez v. Vogel
Filing
40
ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 7/25/2011. (Timken, A)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
3
4
GUADALUPE CHAVEZ,
5
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00911 LJO SKO
Plaintiff,
ORDER re SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
v.
6
RONALD VOGEL,
7
Defendant.
8
/
9
This case is set for a Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on
10
August 25, 2011, at 10:30 a.m. at the U. S. District Court, 2500 Tulare Street, Fresno, California,
11
93721.
12
13
Consideration of settlement is a serious matter that requires thorough preparation prior to
the settlement conference. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
14
1.
15
A settlement conference is more likely to be productive if, before the conference, the
Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer
16
parties exchange written settlement proposals. Accordingly, at least fifteen (15) days prior to the
17
settlement conference, plaintiff’s counsel shall submit a written itemization of damages and
18
settlement demand to each defense counsel with a brief summary of the legal and factual basis
19
supporting the demand. No later than ten (10) days prior to the settlement conference, each
20
defense counsel shall submit a written offer to plaintiff’s counsel with a brief summary of the
21
legal and factual basis supporting the offer.
22
2.
23
The parties are to send Confidential Settlement Conference Statements (Settlement
24
Statement) to the following email address: SKOorders@caed.uscourts.gov, to arrive no later than
25
five (5) business days before the conference. Additionally, each party shall file a Notice of
26
Submission of Confidential Settlement Conference Statement (See L.R. 270 (d)).
Submission and Content of Confidential Settlement Conference Statements
1
1
If the Settlement Conference is continued for any reason, each party must submit a new
Settlement Statement that is complete in itself, without reference to any prior Settlement
2
3
4
Statements.
Settlement Statements must be typed and double spaced. Each Settlement Statement
shall include the following:
5
a.
A brief summary of the core facts, allegations, and defenses.
6
b.
A summary of the proceedings to date.
7
c.
An estimate of the cost and time to be expended for further discovery,
8
pretrial, and trial.
9
d.
The nature of the relief sought.
10
e.
An outline of past settlement efforts including information regarding the
11
"Pre-settlement Conference Exchange of Demand and Offer" required
12
above (including the itemization of damages), and a history of past
13
settlement discussions, offers, and demands.
14
f.
15
A statement of each party’s expectations and goals for the Settlement
Conference.
16
3.
17
The attorneys who will try the case and parties with full and complete settlement
18
authority are required to personally attend the conference. An insured party shall appear by a
19
representative of the insurer who is authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to settle the
20
matter up to the limits of the opposing parties’ existing settlement demand. An uninsured
21
corporate party shall appear by a representative authorized to negotiate, and who has authority to
22
settle the matter up to the amount of the opposing parties’ existing settlement demand or offer.
23
It is difficult for a party who is not present to appreciate the process and the reasons that may
24
justify a change in one’s perspective toward settlement. Accordingly, having a client with
25
authority available by telephone is not an acceptable alternative, except under the most
Attendance of Trial Counsel and Parties Required
26
2
1
extenuating circumstances.1
The Court expects both the lawyers and the party representatives to be fully prepared to
2
participate. The Court encourages all parties to keep an open mind in order to reassess their
3
previous positions and to discover creative means for resolving the dispute.
4
4.
5
The parties shall be prepared to discuss the following at the settlement conference:
6
Issues to Be Discussed
a.
7
Goals in the litigation and problems they would like to address in the
settlement conference and understanding of the opposing side’s goals.
8
b.
The issues (in and outside the lawsuit) that need to be resolved.
9
c.
The strengths and weaknesses of their case.
10
d.
Their understanding of the opposing side’s view of the case.
11
e.
Their points of agreement and disagreement (factual and legal).
12
f.
Any financial, emotional, and/or legal impediments to settlement.
13
g.
Whether settlement or further litigation better enables the accomplishment
14
of their respective goals.
15
h.
Any possibilities for a creative resolution of the dispute.
16
5.
17
The parties are expected to address each other with courtesy and respect, and are
18
encouraged to be frank and open in their discussions. Statements made by any party during the
19
settlement conference are not to be used in discovery and will not be admissible at trial.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated:
Statements Inadmissible
July 25, 2011
/s/ Sheila K. Oberto
22
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
25
1
26
Out of town or out of state travel and the purchase of an airplane ticket are not
extenuating circumstances.
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?