Baltimore v. Haggins

Filing 65

ORDER GRANTING 63 Motion to Allow the Representative From the CDCR to Appear by Telephone at the Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/12/2013. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT BALTIMORE, 12 13 14 15 Case No. 1:10-cv-00931 LJO JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO ALLOW THE REPRESENTATIVE FROM THE CDCR TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE AT THE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE v. CHRISTOPHER HAGGINS Defendant. (Doc. 63) 16 17 Before the Court is the request of the CDCR to allow its representative to appear via 18 telephone at the settlement conference that will occur on March 15, 2013. (Doc. 63) The CDCR 19 notes that allowing its representative to appear by telephone would save costs and will not impact 20 its valuation of the case or its participation in the settlement efforts. 21 Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS: 22 1. The representative of the CDCR may appear at the settlement conference on March 23 15, 2013 provided that; 24 a. Counsel for Defendant makes arrangements with CSP-Corcoran officials to 25 have access to a telephone during the settlement conference. (The Court is 26 aware that cell phone service is not always available in the locations in the 27 prison where the settlement conferences occur and cell phones are not always 28 allowed to be brought into the area where the settlement conference occurs); 1 1 b. Counsel for Defendant has fully briefed the CDCR representative in advance 2 of the conference and counsel has been given sufficient authority to settle the 3 case; 4 c. The CDCR representative remains available by telephone until notified, via 5 counsel, that the conference is concluded. 6 7 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 9 March 12, 2013 /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 DEAC_Sig nature-END: 9j7khijed 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?