Baltimore v. Haggins
Filing
65
ORDER GRANTING 63 Motion to Allow the Representative From the CDCR to Appear by Telephone at the Settlement Conference signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 3/12/2013. (Jessen, A)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
ROBERT BALTIMORE,
12
13
14
15
Case No. 1:10-cv-00931 LJO JLT (PC)
Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO
ALLOW THE REPRESENTATIVE
FROM THE CDCR TO APPEAR BY
TELEPHONE AT THE SETTLEMENT
CONFERENCE
v.
CHRISTOPHER HAGGINS
Defendant.
(Doc. 63)
16
17
Before the Court is the request of the CDCR to allow its representative to appear via
18
telephone at the settlement conference that will occur on March 15, 2013. (Doc. 63) The CDCR
19
notes that allowing its representative to appear by telephone would save costs and will not impact
20
its valuation of the case or its participation in the settlement efforts.
21
Therefore, good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS:
22
1. The representative of the CDCR may appear at the settlement conference on March
23
15, 2013 provided that;
24
a. Counsel for Defendant makes arrangements with CSP-Corcoran officials to
25
have access to a telephone during the settlement conference. (The Court is
26
aware that cell phone service is not always available in the locations in the
27
prison where the settlement conferences occur and cell phones are not always
28
allowed to be brought into the area where the settlement conference occurs);
1
1
b. Counsel for Defendant has fully briefed the CDCR representative in advance
2
of the conference and counsel has been given sufficient authority to settle the
3
case;
4
c. The CDCR representative remains available by telephone until notified, via
5
counsel, that the conference is concluded.
6
7
8
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
9
March 12, 2013
/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
11
DEAC_Sig nature-END:
9j7khijed
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?