Bussiere v. Cano et al

Filing 100

ORDER ADOPTING 86 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and Denying 58 71 Motions for Preliminary Injunction signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 08/15/2012. (Flores, E)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
ARTHUR T. BUSSIERE,

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00945-AWI-GBC (PC)

11
Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING
MOTIONS FOR PRELIMINARY
INJUNCTION

12
v.
13
CANO, et al.,
14

Docs. 58, 71, 86
Defendants.

15

/

16
17

On May 26, 2010, Plaintiff Arthur T. Bussiere (“Plaintiff”), a state prisoner proceeding pro

18

se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was

19

referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule

20

302.

21

On October 17, 2011 and January 26, 2012, Plaintiff filed motions for preliminary injunction

22

against prison officials at Corcoran State Prison for retaliation by prison officials who are not parties

23

to this action. Docs. 58, 71. On April 17,2012, the Magistrate Judge issued Findings and

24

Recommendations recommending denying Plaintiff’s Motions for Injunctive Relief. On May 11,

25

2012, Plaintiff filed Objections. Doc. 87.

26

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

27

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and

28

Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
Page 1 of 2

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

3
4

and
2.

5
6

The Findings and Recommendations, filed April 17, 2012, are ADOPTED, in full;

Plaintiff’s motions for preliminary injunction, filed October 17, 2011 and January 26,
2012, are DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

7
8

Dated:
0m8i78

August 15, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2