Fraher v. Heyne et al

Filing 42

ORDER GRANTING Plaintiff's Motion for Resolution of Issues 32 , signed by Magistrate Judge Michael J. Seng on 2/13/13. (Hellings, J)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 CECILIA FRAHER, CASE No. 1:10-cv-0951-LJO-MJS (PC) 10 Plaintiff, 11 12 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RESOLUTION OF ISSUES v. (ECF No. 32) 13 DR. S. HEYNE, et al. 14 15 Defendants. / 16 17 Plaintiff Cecilia Fraher (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff initiated this action on May 27, 2010. (Compl., ECF No. 1.) The Court 20 screened Plaintiff’s initial Complaint and ordered Plaintiff to e file a new complaint or notify 21 22 the Court if she was willing to proceed on her cognizable claim. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff filed 23 a First Amended Complaint which the Court dismissed, with leave to amend, for failure to 24 state a claim. (ECF Nos. 9 & 10.) Plaintiff filed a Second Amended Complaint. (Am. 25 Compl., ECF No. 13.) The Court found that Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint stated 26 a claim under the Eighth Amendment to the United States Constitution against Defendants 27 -1- 1 Le and Mitchell for failing to provide her with adequate medical care. (ECF No. 14.) The 2 3 Court directed these Defendants be served. (ECF No. 16.) Defendants Le and Mitchell have since fined an Answer and this matter is currently proceeding through discovery. (ECF 4 5 Nos. 25 & 28.) On November 14, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting that the Court issue 6 7 decisions on her pending motions to amend (ECF No. 26) and for injunctive relief (ECF No. 8 27). The Court has since issued decisions on both of these motions. (ECF Nos. 36 & 37.) 9 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s motion is GRANTED. 10 11 12 13 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 15 ci4d6 February 13, 2013 /s/ Michael J. Seng UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?