Bullard v. Bemrose
Filing
8
ORDER DISMISSING This Action as Opened in Error, and DIRECTING Clerk's Office to Close Case, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 6/14/10. (CASE CLOSED)(Hellings, J)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 On May 26, 2010, a civil rights action was transferred to this court from the Northern District of California. The action was initially opened in the Northern District on May 18, 2010, following the receipt of a motion filed by Plaintiff Efren Bullard. The action was transferred to this court because Plaintiff complained in the motion about his inability to access his legal material following his transfer to the California Correctional Institution in Tehachapi, which is located in this jurisdiction. No complaint was filed. The Court has reviewed the motion, and finds that it was intended for filing in case number 3:09-cv-04772-RS Bullard v. Bemrose, et al., which is open and pending in the Northern District. The motion was not intended by Plaintiff to be a complaint initiating a new action. Therefore, this action is DISMISSED on the ground that it was opened in error, and the Clerk's Office shall close the case. /// /// /// 1 v. J. BEMROSE, et al., Defendants. / EFREN BULLARD, Plaintiff, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-00959-AWI-SMS PC ORDER DISMISSING THIS ACTION AS OPENED IN ERROR, AND DIRECTING CLERK'S OFFICE TO CLOSE CASE (Doc. 1)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
If Plaintiff still wishes to seek the relief at issue in his motion, he must re-file it in the Northern District, and include case number 3:09-cv-04772-RS in the caption to ensure the motion is filed in his pending case.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: 0m8i78 June 14, 2010 /s/ Anthony W. Ishii CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?