Wardwell v. McDonald's Corporation et al
Filing
15
STIPULATION For DISMISSAL; ORDER, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 10/18/2010. CASE CLOSED. The parties having so stipulated, it is hereby ORDERED that the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.(Scrivner, E)
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Tanya Moore, Esq. SBN 206683 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C. 332 N. Second Street San Jose, CA 95112 Telephone (408) 271-6600 Facsimile (408) 298-6046 Attorneys for Plaintiff Eric Wardwell
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) MCDONALD'S CORPORATION DBA MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT ) ) #7281, et al., ) ) ) Defendants. ) ERIC WARDWELL, No. 1:10-CV-00981-OWW-DLB STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL; ORDER Assigned to U.S. District Judge Oliver W. Wanger Complaint filed: June 2, 2010
Plaintiff Eric Wardwell, through his attorney, Tanya Moore, Moore Law Firm, P.C., San Jose, California, and Defendant McDonald's Corporation, through its attorney Benjamin M. Glickman, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher, LLP, Palo Alto, California, hereby stipulate that the above-captioned action shall be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety. Date: October 18, 2010 MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
/s/Tanya Moore Tanya Moore Attorney for Plaintiff
Stipulation for Dismissal
Wardwell v. McDonald's Corporation Page 1 1
Date: October 18, 2010
2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
DEAC_Signature-END:
GIBSON, DUNN & CRUTCHER, LLP
/s/ Benjamin M. Glickman Attorneys for Defendant MCDONALD'S CORPORATION ORDER THE PARTIES HAVING SO STIPULATED, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the above-captioned action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
October 18, 2010
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
emm0d64h
Stipulation for Dismissal
Wardwell v. McDonald's Corporation Page 2 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?