Lukenbill v. Department of the United States Air Force et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISREGARDING FILING 19 , signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on 7/30/2020. (Hall, S)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

KATHRYN A. LUKENBILL,
Plaintiff,

12
v.

13
14

DEPARTMENT OF THE UNITED STATES
AIR FORCE, et al.,

15
Defendants.
16

) Case No.: 1:10-cv-01003 NONE JLT
)
) ORDER DISREGARDING FILING
) (Doc. 19)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Ms. Lukenbill has filed a document entitled “Consent/Decline of U.S. Magistrate Judge

17
18

Jurisdiction.” (Doc. 19) On the form, she has typed in “Redaction of Minor’s Information Case 1:10-

19

cv-01003-LJO-JLT Document All.” The Court cannot determine what Ms. Lukenbill is seeking.
If she intends the filing to be a motion to redact the minor’s name, the motion is defective. It

20
21

does not indicate why, given the fact that the public docket has reflected the child’s1 name for 10

22

years, redaction should occur now. Likewise, it fails to outline any legal authority analyzing the

23

issues. Thus, the filing (Doc. 19) is DISREGARDED.

24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.

26

Dated:

July 30, 2020

/s/ Jennifer L. Thurston
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

27
28
1

In the order dismissing the case issued in September 2010 (Doc. 18), the Court was uncertain whether the child had
achieved the age of majority by that time. Because the events alleged in the complaint involved a 16-year-old, the child is
now an adult, who is at least 26.