Moore v. Stan Boyett & Son, Inc. et al
Filing
36
STIPULATION For Dismissal Of Action; ORDER, signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 1/20/2012. CASE CLOSED.(Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
k. Randolph Moore, SBN 106933
Tanya E. Moore, SBN 206683
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
332 North Second Street
San Jose, CA 95112
Telephone (408) 271-6600
Facsimile (408) 298-6046
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Ronald Moore
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
RONALD MOORE,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
vs.
LAJVINDER SINGH, et al,
15
Defendants.
16
17
) No. 1:10-cv-1011-AWI-GSA
)
) STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL OF
) ACTION; ORDER
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
18
19
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff Ronald Moore, by and through
20
his counsel, and Defendant Pritpal Kaur, the remaining party who has appeared in this action,
21
that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), this action be dismissed with
22
prejudice in its entirety.
23
Dated: January 20, 2012
MOORE LAW FIRM, P.C.
24
25
/s/ Tanya E. Moore
Tanya E. Moore
Attorney for Plaintiff Ronald Moore
26
27
28
///
Moore v. Singh, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 1
1
Dated: January 19, 2012
FISHER & PHILLIPS, LLP
2
3
/s/ James Fessenden
James Fessenden, Attorneys for
Defendant Pritpal Kaur
4
5
6
7
8
ORDER
9
10
The parties having so stipulated,
11
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action be dismissed with prejudice in its entirety.
12
The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this action.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED.
17
Dated:
January 20, 2012
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
18
DEAC_Signature-END:
19
0m8i788
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Moore v. Singh, et al.
Stipulation for Dismissal
Page 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?