USA v. Real Property Located at 2421 Carolyn Lane, Kingsburg, CA, APN: 394-203-25 et al
Filing
12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin on 7/12/2010. CASE STAYED and Scheduling Conference VACATED. (Lundstrom, T)
USA v. Real Property Located at 2421 Carolyn Lane, Kingsburg, CA, APN: 394-203-25 et al
Doc. 12
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney United States Courthouse 2500 Tulare Street, Suite 4401 Fresno, California 93721 Telephone: (559) 497-4000 Facsimile: (559) 497-4099 Attorneys for Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2421 ) CAROLYN LANE, KINGSBURG, ) CALIFORNIA, FRESNO COUNTY, ) APN: 394-203-25, INCLUDING ALL ) APPURTENANCES AND ) IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ) ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2639 W. ) FAIRMONT AVENUE, #204, FRESNO, ) CALIFORNIA, FRESNO COUNTY, ) APN: 424-222-24, INCLUDING ALL ) APPURTENANCES AND ) IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ) ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 4136 N. ) THESTA STREET #5, FRESNO, ) CALIFORNIA, FRESNO COUNTY, ) APN: 436-350-06, INCLUDING ALL ) APPURTENANCES AND ) IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, and ) ) REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 2131 S. ) VAN NESS AVENUE, FRESNO, ) CALIFORNIA, FRESNO COUNTY, ) APN: 480-132-24-01, INCLUDING ALL ) APPURTENANCES AND ) IMPROVEMENTS THERETO, ) ) Defendants. ) _____________________________________)
STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON
1:10-CV-01013-LJO-GSA STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON
1
Dockets.Justia.com
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Plaintiff, United States of America and Potential Claimants Edwan Dablan and Horieh Jordana Khalid Dablan as follows: 1. Potential Claimant Edwan Dablan is presently facing federal criminal charges in the
Eastern District of California, United States v. Edwan Dablan, et al., 1:10-CR-00173-AWI, allegedly relating to transactions or events which form the basis for this civil forfeiture action. 2. The parties recognize that proceeding with this action has potential adverse affects
on the prosecution of the related criminal case and/or upon Potential Claimant Edwan Dablan's right against self-incrimination in the related federal criminal case. 3. Publication of the civil forfeiture action is pending and to date neither Edwan Dablan,
Horieh Jordana Khalid Dablan, nor any other potential claimants have filed claims, answers, or otherwise appeared in this action. THEREFORE, the parties to this action stipulate and request as follows: 1. Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 981(g), this action be stayed pending the conclusion of the
federal criminal action presently pending against Edwan Dablan in the Eastern District of California; 2. The Scheduling Conference in the civil case scheduled for September 8, 2010, at 9:30
a.m. in Courtroom 10 before Magistrate Judge Gary S. Austin be vacated; and, // // // // // // // // // // // //
STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON
2
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
3.
The parties are to promptly notify the Court when the criminal case resolves.
Dated: July 6, 2010
BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney /s/ Deanna L. Martinez DEANNA L. MARTINEZ Assistant United States Attorney
Dated: July 1, 2010
/s/ Daniel A. Bacon DANIEL A. BACON Attorney for Potential Claimants Edwan Dablan and Horieh Jordana Khalid Dablan (Original signature retained by attorney) ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. 14 Dated: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 6i0kij
July 12, 2010
/s/ Gary S. Austin UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
STIPULATION TO STAY CASE AND TO VACATE SCHEDULING CONFERENCE; ORDER THEREON
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?