Ford v. Wildey et al

Filing 122

ORDER REGARDING Plaintiff's 121 Motion for Clarification, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/18/2015. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BENNY FORD, 12 Plaintiff, 13 14 v. G. WILDEY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Case No.: 1:10-cv-01024-LJO-SAB (PC) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION [ECF No. 121] Plaintiff Benny Ford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 17 18 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On May 15, 2015, Plaintiff filed a motion for clarification relating to pretrial proceedings. 20 On April 13, 2015, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending 21 denial of Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 115.) As stated in the findings and 22 recommendations, the recommendations are submitted to the district judge who may “accept, reject or 23 modify, in whole or in part, the findings and recommendations …” 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). The 24 Findings and Recommendations have not yet been reviewed by the assigned district judge, and 25 Plaintiff’s motion for clarification as to further proceedings is premature until the resolution of the 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 1 pending findings and recommendations. Thus, Plaintiff’s motion for clarification as to further 2 proceedings is DENIED as premature. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 Dated: 6 May 18, 2015 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?