Ford v. Wildey et al

Filing 125

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION, DENYING Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 63 , 95 , 102 , 103 , 115 , signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 6/23/15. (Hellings, J)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

BENNY FORD,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
G. WILDEY, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Case No.: 1:10-cv-01024-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DENYING
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
[ECF Nos. 63, 95, 102, 103, 115]

Plaintiff Benny Ford is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

19

The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §

20

636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 13, 2015, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and

21

Recommendations which was served on the parties and which contained notice to the parties that

22

Objections to the Findings and Recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Defendants filed

23

objections on May 13, 2015, and Plaintiff filed a response on May 26, 2015. Local Rule 304(b), (d).

24

In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de

25

novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, including Defendants’ objections,

26

the Court finds the Findings and Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper

27

analysis.

28

///
1

1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

2

1.

The Findings and Recommendations, filed on April 13, 2015, is adopted in full; and

3

2.

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment is DENIED.

4
5
6
7

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:

/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill

June 23, 2015

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2