Fuentez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

ORDER Approving the Foregoing 13 Stipulation to Voluntary Remand Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), signed by Chief Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 12/17/2010. CASE CLOSED; Judgment Entered. (Marrujo, C)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX TIMOTHY R. BOLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney California State Bar No. 259511 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105-2102 Telephone: (415) 977-8982 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: timothy.bolin@ssa.gov Attorneys for Defendant Michael J. Astrue, Commissioner of Social Security UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA FRESNO DIVISION ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-CV-01032-AWI-SKO STIPULATION TO VOLUNTARY REMAND PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. 405(g) AND TO ENTRY OF JUDGMENT; ORDER NANETTE FUENTEZ, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, through their undersigned attorneys and with the approval of the Court, that Defendant has agreed to a voluntary remand of this case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g). The purpose of the remand is to provide Plaintiff with a de novo hearing and a new decision. Upon receipt of the Court's remand order, an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) shall consider all medical source opinions, including that of Lynn Kerr, M.D., and, unless a treating source's opinion is given controlling weight, the ALJ shall explain the weight accorded to each -1- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 source. The ALJ shall consider the evidence in Exhibits C8F and C9F of the administrative transcript. The ALJ shall consider whether Plaintiff's fall on her left knee, a few days prior to turning age 55, might cause standing or walking difficulties. The ALJ shall consider Plaintiff's changed circumstance of attaining the age of 55 during the period at issue and whether it rebutted the presumptions of nondisability and continuing applicability of the residual functional capacity determined in October 2005. The ALJ shall consider Plaintiff's asthma and the possible environmental limitations that it might entail. Finally, ALJ shall consider all the new medical evidence presented in conjunction with Plaintiff's second Social Security application and, if warranted by this expanded record, obtain a vocational expert testimony to determine if Plaintiff is able to perform her past relevant work or other jobs that exist in significant numbers in the national economy. Dated: December 16, 2010 By: /s/ Sengthiene Bosavanh* SENGTHIENE BOSAVANH *By email authorization on Dec. 16, 2010 Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: December 16, 2010 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration By: /s/ Timothy R. Bolin TIMOTHY R. BOLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney Attorneys for Defendant -2- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 THE COURT APPROVES THE FOREGOING STIPULATION AND SO ORDERS. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: DEAC_Sig nat ur e - END: December 17, 2010 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 0m8i788 -3-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?