Blackman v. Hedgpeth et al
ORDER signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 7/28/2010 DISMISSING CASE without Prejudice for failure to pay filing fee. CASE CLOSED.(Lundstrom, T)
(PC) Blackman v. Hedgpeth et al
1 2 3 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
TONY BLACKMAN, Plaintiff, v. A. Hedgpeth, et al., Defendants. /
CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1044-LJO-MJS (PC) ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEE (ECF No. 3)
Plaintiff Tony Blackman, a prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action on June 10, 2010. On June 16, 2010, the Court found that Plaintiff was not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and ordered Plaintiff to pay the $350.00 filing fee in full within thirty days. (ECF No. 3.) More than thirty days have passed and Plaintiff has not complied with or otherwise responded to the Court's order. Plaintiff was warned that dismissal would occur if he failed to obey the order. A civil action may not proceed absent payment of the filing fee or the grant of in forma pauperis status. 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914, 1915. Because Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and has not paid the filing fee, dismissal of this action is appropriate. In re
Phenylpropanolamine (PPA) Products Liability Litigation, 460 F.3d 1217, 1226 (9th Cir. 2006); Local Rule 11-110. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 11-110 for failure to pay the filing fee. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: b9ed48 July 28, 2010 /s/ Lawrence J. O'Neill UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?