Hernandez v. Yates et al
Filing
27
ORDER ADOPTING 23 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Dismissing Certain Claims and Defendants from Action signed by District Judge Lawrence J. O'Neill on 01/21/2014. M. Martinez Terminated from Action. (Flores, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
TONY HERNANDEZ,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
M. MARTINEZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
Case No.: 1:10-cv-01064-LJO-SAB (PC)
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATION, DISMISSING CERTAIN
CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS FROM ACTION
[ECF No. 23]
Plaintiff Tony Hernandez is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action
17
18
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
19
The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §
20
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 20, 2013, the Magistrate Judge filed a Findings and
21
Recommendations which was served on Plaintiff and contained notice that Objections to the Findings
22
and Recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Plaintiff filed an Objection on January 2,
23
2014. Local Rule 304(b), (d).
24
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a de
25
novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the Court finds the Findings and
26
Recommendations to be supported by the record and by proper analysis.
27
///
28
///
1
1
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
2
1.
The Findings and Recommendations, filed on December 20, 2013, is adopted in full;
3
2.
Defendant M. Martinez is DISMISSED from the action for failure to state a cognizable
4
5
6
claim; and
3.
Plaintiff’s Due Process and Equal Protection claims are DISMISSED from the action
for failure to state a cognizable claim.
7
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated:
/s/ Lawrence J. O’Neill
January 21, 2014
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?