Richard Allen Smith v. Ken Clark
Filing
15
ORDER Re: FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS (Doc. 14 ), ORDER Granting Respondent's Motion To Dismiss The Petition Without Leave To Amend (Docs. 13 , 1 ), ORDER Dismissing The Petition Without Leave To Amend (Doc. 1 ), Declining To Issue A Certificate Of Appealability, And Directing The Clerk To Close The Case, signed by Judge Oliver W. Wanger on 7/8/2011. CASE CLOSED. (Fahrney, E)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
10
RICHARD ALLEN SMITH,
11
Petitioner,
12
v.
13
KATHLEEN ALLISON,
14
Respondent.
15
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
1:10-cv—01111–OWW-SMS-HC
ORDER RE: FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS (DOC. 14)
ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S
MOTION TO DISMISS THE PETITION
WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND (DOCS. 13,
1)
ORDER DISMISSING THE PETITION
WITHOUT LEAVE TO AMEND (DOC. 1),
DECLINING TO ISSUE A CERTIFICATE
OF APPEALABILITY, AND DIRECTING
THE CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE
18
Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in
19
forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant
20
to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.
The matter has been referred to the
21
Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local
22
Rules 302 and 304.
23
On May 27, 2011, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and
24
recommendations to dismiss the petition without leave to amend
25
for failure to state a cognizable claim, decline to issue a
26
certificate of appealability, and direct the clerk to close the
27
action.
The findings and recommendations were served by mail on
28
1
1
Petitioner on the same date.
2
informed Petitioner that objections were due within thirty days
3
of service.
4
5
6
The findings and recommendations
Although the deadline for filing objections has passed, no
objections have been filed.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636
7
(b)(1)(C), this Court has conducted a de novo review of the case.
8
The undersigned has carefully reviewed the entire file.
9
Court finds that the report and recommendations are supported by
10
The
the record and proper analysis.
11
Accordingly, it IS ORDERED that:
12
1)
13
14
15
The findings and recommendations filed on May 27, 2011,
are ADOPTED in full; and
2)
Respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition without
leave to amend is GRANTED; and
16
3) The petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED
17
without leave to amend for failure to state a claim cognizable in
18
a proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254; and
19
4)
The Court DECLINES to issue a certificate of
20
appealability; and
21
5) The Clerk is DIRECTED to close the action. IT IS SO
ORDERED.
22
Emm0d6Dated:
23
July 8, 2011
/s/ Oliver W. Wanger
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?