Perkins v. Crum et al

Filing 9

ORDER DENYING 7 and 8 Plaintiff's Motions Requesting Screening, signed by Magistrate Judge Gerald B. Cohn on 4/22/2011. (Jessen, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 LONNIE DONELL PERKINS, CASE NO. 1:10-cv-01115-GBC (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS REQUESTING SCREENING 10 v. 11 (ECF Nos. 7 & 8) R. CRUM, et al., 12 Defendants. 13 / 14 15 ORDER 16 Plaintiff Lonnie Donell Perkins (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and 17 in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed this 18 action on June 21, 2010 and consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction on July 26, 2010. 19 (ECF Nos. 1 & 5.) Plaintiff’s Complaint has not been screened. Pending before the Court 20 now are Plaintiff’s Motions for Screening and Demand for Jury Trial, asking the Court to 21 screen his complaint. (ECF Nos. 7 & 8.) 22 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief 23 against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. 24 § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has 25 raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that fail to state a claim upon which 26 relief may be granted, or that seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from 27 such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), (2). The Court will direct the United States Marshal 28 to serve Plaintiff’s complaint only after the Court has screened the complaint and 1 determined that it contains cognizable claims for relief against the named Defendants. The 2 Court has a large number of prisoner civil rights cases pending before it and will screen 3 Plaintiff’s complaint in due course. 4 Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motions for Screening are DENIED. 5 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 8 Dated: 1j0bbc April 22, 2011 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?