Jackson v. Palombo et al

Filing 45

ORDER DENYING 41 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 4/13/2012. (Sant Agata, S)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD JACKSON, 1:10-cv-01129-SKO (PC) 12 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL Plaintiff, 13 vs. (Doc. 41) 14 MIKE PALOMBO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 ________________________________/ 17 On March 28, 2012, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the appointment of counsel. Plaintiff 18 does not have a constitutional right to the appointment of counsel in this action. Palmer v. Valdez, 19 560 F.3d 965, 970 (9th Cir. 2009); Storseth v. Spellman, 654 F.2d 1349, 1353 (9th Cir. 1981). The 20 Court may request the voluntary assistance of counsel pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(1), but it will 21 do so only if exceptional circumstances exist. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 22 F.2d 1328, 1331 (9th Cir. 1981). In making this determination, the Court must evaluate the 23 likelihood of success on the merits and the ability of Plaintiff to articulate his claims pro se in light 24 of the complexity of the legal issues involved. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation marks 25 omitted); Wilborn, 789 F.2d at 1331. Neither consideration is dispositive and they must be viewed 26 together. Palmer, 560 F.3d at 970 (citation and quotation marks omitted); Wilborn 789 F.2d at 1331. 27 28 -1- 1 In the present case, the Court does not find the required exceptional circumstances. Even if 2 it is assumed that Plaintiff is not well versed in the law and that he has made serious allegations 3 which, if proved, would entitle him to relief, his case is not exceptional. The Court is faced with 4 similar cases almost daily. Therefore, Plaintiff’s request for the appointment of counsel is HEREBY 5 DENIED. 6 7 8 Dated: i0d3h8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. April 13, 2012 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?