Wells Fargo Bank et al v. Shree Balaji Hospitality LP et al

Filing 10

STIPULATION for Extension of Time for EDF REsource Capital, Inc. to Respond to Complaint; ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis L. Beck on 7/13/2010. ( Response due by 8/16/2010) (Figueroa, O)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

REAL ESTATE LAW GROUP LLP JASON L. HOFFMAN (Bar No. 179924) 3455 American River Drive, Suite C Sacramento, California 95864 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for EDF REsource Capital, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA (FRESNO DIVISION) WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, successor in interest by consolidation to Placer Sierra Bank, Plaintiff v. SHREE BALAJI HOSPITALITY, LP, a California Limited Partnership; BALWANTSINH DOLATSINH THAKOR, an individual; LABATEN BALWANTSINH THAKOR, an individual; EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC., a California corporation; U.S. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, a government entity; CITY OF OAKDALE, a government entity; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 1:10-cv-1150 AWI-DLB STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR EDF RESOURCE CAPITAL, INC. TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER

22916

1

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1150 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29
22916

Defendant EDF REsource Capital, Inc. ("REsource"), and Plaintiff Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ("Plaintiff"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate to extend the time for REsource to respond to the Complaint which was removed to the United States District Court on June 24, 2010, (Docket No. 1) as follows:

1.

Plaintiff filed a Complaint in Stanislaus County Superior Court seeking, among

other things, to foreclose the interest in certain real property held by the United States of America, Small Business Administration. 2. Plaintiff caused the Complaint to be served upon REsource on June 15, 2010, and

the United States removed the case to United States District Court on June 24, 2010. Under Rule 81(c)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States is required to file a response to the complaint within 7 days after the notice of removal is filed or 21 days after service of the initial pleading. 3. 4. a response. Based upon the above, the parties stipulate that REsource's time to respond to the Complaint shall be extended up to and including August 16, 2010. The parties request the Court endorse this stipulation by way of formal order. Respectfully submitted, A scheduling conference has been set for September 21, 2010. REsource's counsel is currently in the process of reviewing records and preparing

Dated: July 13, 2010

REAL ESTATE LAW GROUP LLP /s/ Jason L. Hoffman ______________________________________ BY: JASON L. HOFFMAN Attorneys for EDF REsource Capital, Inc.

2

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1150 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29

Dated: July 13, 2010

COLEMAN & HOROWITT, LLP /s/ Kurt V. Jaenike [as authorized July 12, 2010] ______________________________________ BY: KURT V. JAENIKE Attorneys for Plaintiff, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association ORDER

IT IS SO ORDERED that REsource's time to respond to the Complaint is extended to August 16, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated:
DEAC_Signature-END:

July 13, 2010

/s/ Dennis

L. Beck

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3b142a

22916

3

CASE NO. 1:10-cv-1150 STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT; ORDER.