Michael Roy Johnson v. United States Parole Com.

Filing 17

ORDER to SHOW CAUSE Why Sanctions Should Not Be Imposed on Respondent for Failure to Comply With Court Order 13 , signed by Magistrate Judge Sandra M. Snyder on 10/19/2010. Respondent's Show Cause Response due by 11/9/2010. (Jessen, A)

(HC) Johnson v. Clay

Doc. 17

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 MICHAEL ROY JOHNSON, 11 Petitioner, 12 v. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Petitioner filed the petition for writ of habeas corpus on June 18, 2010. By order of August 10, 2010, the Court directed Respondent to file a response within sixty days from the date of service of that order. Over sixty days have passed and Respondent has failed to file a response. Review of the certificate of service reveals that Respondent was served with this order at the appropriate address. Local Rule 110 provides that "a failure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Local Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for the imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.@ Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty (20) days of service of this order, Respondent shall SHOW CAUSE why appropriate sanctions should not be imposed for 1
Dockets.Justia.com

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1:10-cv-01164-SMS (HC) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED ON RESPONDENT FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH COURT'S ORDER [Doc. 13] Respondent. /

HECTOR A. RIOS,

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

failing to obey a court order. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: icido3 October 19, 2010 /s/ Sandra M. Snyder UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

2