USA v. Approximately $156,000.00 in U.S. Currency

Filing 14

SECOND ORDER CONTINUING Scheduling Conference, Signed by Magistrate Judge Jennifer L. Thurston on December 1, 2010. The Court ORDERS: 1) Plaintiff to seek a default judgment no later than January 20, 2011; 2) The Scheduling Conference currently set on December 16, 2010, will be continued to February 9, 2011 at 10:00 AM in Bakersfield at Truxtun. (Arellano, S.)

Download PDF
USA v. Approximately $156,000.00 in U.S. Currency Doc. 14 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 12 13 14 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 Dockets.Justia.com UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. APPROXIMATELY $156,000 IN U.S. CURRENCY, ) Case No.: 1:10-cv-01179 AWI JLT ) ) ) ) SECOND ORDER CONTINUING ) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE ) ) ) ) ) On August 30, 2010, Plaintiff filed proof of completion of service by publication. (Doc. 9) Since that time, there has been no appearance by any party claiming an interest in the funds at issue. As a result, on October 7, 2010, the Court continued the Mandatory Scheduling Conference that was scheduled on November 8, 2010 to December 16, 2010. (Doc. 12) The Court encouraged Plaintiff to seek a default judgment as soon as possible. Id. Though the date for the continued Mandatory Scheduling Conference is approaching, still no person has appeared and claimed an interest in the funds and Plaintiff has taken no steps toward obtaining default judgment. Therefore the Court ORDERS: 1. Plaintiff is ordered to seek a default judgment no later than January 20, 2011; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2. The Scheduling Conference currently set on December 16, 2010, will be continued to February 9, 2011 at 10:00 a.m. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 1, 2010 9j7khi /s/ Jennifer L. Thurston UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?