Davis v. Kelso et al

Filing 97

ORDER requiring Defendants to file an answer on or before October 5, 2018 signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 9/21/2018. (Lundstrom, T)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10
11

CHARLES T. DAVIS,

12

Plaintiff,

13
14

v.
CLARK J. KELSO, et al.,

15

Defendants.

16

Plaintiff Charles T. Davis is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action

17
18

pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983.
On September 6, 2018, an order issued denying Defendants’ motion to dismiss but dismissing

19
20

) Case No.: 1:10-cv-01184-DAD-SAB (PC)
)
)
) ORDER REQUIRING DEFENDANTS TO FILE
AN ANSWER ON OR BEFORE OCTOBER 5, 2018
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff’s claims for injunctive and declaratory relief, and referred the matter back to the undersigned.
Pursuant to Rule 12 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, when a motion under Rule 12 is

21
22

decided, the defendant has fourteen (14) days after notice of the court’s action to file a responsive

23

pleading. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)(A).

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28
1

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants Cate and Yates shall file an answer

1
2

to the complaint on or before October 5, 2018.

3
4
5

IT IS SO ORDERED.

6

Dated:

7

September 21, 2018
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2