Vasquez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Filing 14

STIPULATION and ORDER for extension of time 13 signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/13/2011. (Timken, A)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX Social Security Administration BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant United States Attorney Social Security Administration 5 6 7 333 Market Street, Suite 1500 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8975 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 E-Mail:Brenda.Pullin@ssa.gov 8 Attorneys for Defendant 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 CARMEN PERES VASQUEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) _________________________________) CIVIL NO. 1:10-CV-01231-SKO STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME 19 20 21 22 The parties hereby stipulate through counsel, with the Court’s approval as indicated by issuance 23 of the attached Order, that Defendant shall have a first extension of time of 30 days to respond to 24 Plaintiff’s motion opening brief, to allow for Defendant’s further review of the case in light of the 25 arguments for remand presented in Plaintiff’s brief. Defendant’s current deadline is May 23, 2011, and 26 the new deadline will be June 22, 2011. The Court’s Scheduling Order shall be modified accordingly. 27 28 Respectfully submitted, 1 2 Dated: May 12, 2011 /s/ Bess Brewer (As authorized via email) BESS BREWER Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: May 12, 2011 BENJAMIN B. WAGNER United States Attorney 3 4 5 6 8 /s/ Brenda M. Pullin BRENDA M. PULLIN Special Assistant U.S. Attorney 9 Attorneys for Defendant 7 10 11 ORDER 12 13 14 15 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: ie14hj May 13, 2011 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?